Although the number of malicious threats against the open-source
Linux operating system doubled in 2005 over the previous year, a
security company said Friday, it's users of Apple Computer's Mac OS X
who should be afraid of the future.
Moscow-based Kaspersky Labs on Friday released the results of
analyses of its malware database, and said that in 2005, it spotted 863
pieces of malware targeting Linux, more than twice 2004's final count
of 422.
"This is not at all surprising as Linux is the most popular
Unix-type system," noted Konstantin Sapronov, the author of the report
and a virus analyst at Kaspersky.
In comparison, Windows's malware affliction during 2005 overwhelmed
Linux's; rival security firm Symantec, for instance, said in March that
it discovered nearly 11,000 Windows viruses and worms in the last half
of 2005 alone.
Still, the boost in Linux malware is worth watching, said Sapronov,
who noted that some of 2005's threats spread just like Windows'
attacks, and like those aimed at Microsoft, open backdoors to the
compromised computers so they can be used to spew spam, host malicious
Web sites, or launch denial-of-service attacks.
But it's Apple's operating system that Sapronov believes will be the biggest alternative target to Windows in 2006.
"Apple gives even more scope for development and malware evolution,"
said Sapronov in his report. "The move to intel processors may be
revolutionary."
Nor should Apple users continue to delude themselves that the Mac
operating system is invulnerable to the kind of attacks common in the
Windows world.
"The [Mac] operating system developers have also made errors. Over
the past few weeks, we've seen two proof of concept worms for OS X, and
these clearly illustrate errors in the system architecture," said
Sapronov, referring to such exploits as the zero-day bug uncovered in
February.
"There has also been an exploit for the Safari web browser, which
makes it possible to launch a script and execute commands on the user's
computer," added Sapronov. "It therefore seems clear that OS X may be
fertile soil for security researchers."
As if to prove Sapronov's point, on Wednesday an independent researcher disclosed a half-dozen zero-day bugs in Mac OS X.
|